Kevin Surace
2 minute read
What happened at Stryker today isn't a malware story. It's an identity story. And it's one the industry has seen before — the Sony hack, twelve years ago, followed a similar path. A dozen years later, the attack surface has changed. The fundamental failure hasn't.
Here's what the reporting tells us: Stryker's Microsoft environment was compromised at scale. No ransomware. No novel exploit. Handala claims 200,000 devices wiped, 50TB of data exfiltrated — and multiple sources point to Microsoft Intune as the likely mechanism. That matters, because Intune is a legitimate management platform. It's designed to remotely wipe enrolled devices across Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and ChromeOS. In the wrong hands, your trusted control plane becomes the weapon. (BleepingComputer)
To use Intune this way, you need one thing: a privileged Microsoft identity. An Entra global admin. An Intune administrator. An account with equivalent authority.
How do you get it? The same ways that have always worked: phishing, session theft, AiTM attacks against legacy MFA, help desk social engineering, stolen admin credentials. Once you own the identity plane, you don't hack 200,000 assets one by one. You issue legitimate remote commands — and the infrastructure does the rest. (Krebs on Security)
This is also why Stryker reported no indication of ransomware or malware. When an attacker controls native administrative functions — wiping endpoints, disabling login surfaces, pushing destructive actions through trusted channels — they don't need conventional malware. They are the admin.
The attacker's branding reportedly appeared on login pages. That's not a ransomware signature. That's a flag planted at the identity layer.
Stryker generated over $25 billion in revenue in 2025. Roughly $68.8 million per day. Not all of that evaporates during an outage — but the exposure compounds fast when manufacturing, order flow, hospital support, field sales, and supply chain operations go dark globally. (Q4 Capital)
Realistic damage range: $150 million to $500 million. Potentially higher.
Recovery looks like this: initial containment in days. Partial operations restored in one to three weeks. Most users and devices functional in 30 to 90 days. Full rebuild — forensics, credential reset, re-enrollment, confidence restoration — six to twelve months.
The attacker was in for hours. Stryker pays for it for months.
It's a flaw in identity assurance.
The moment a credential can be stolen, relayed, or social-engineered — the moment a push notification can be fatigued, a session hijacked, a help desk bypassed — the entire control plane is available to anyone who can impersonate the person who holds it.
Token exists precisely here. Biometric-assured, device-bound, cryptographically enforced identity. Nothing to phish. Nothing to relay. No shared secret. No easy bypass. Real presence. Real biometrics. Real proof — tied to the human being, the device, and the session.
If the identity cannot be stolen, the admin cannot be impersonated. That is the difference between cleanup and prevention. Token deals in absolutes.
Watch Webinar In today's rapidly evolving cyber landscape, identity security is more critical than ever. As organizations face growing threats like data breaches and ransomware attacks, the role of identity and access management (IAM) has never been more vital. In a recent webinar, "The Increasing Importance of Identity Security in the Era of the Mega Breach," John Gunn, CEO of Token, and Jon Lehtinen, Senior Director of Security at Okta, shared their insights on the current state of identity security, key trends driving these threats, and practical steps for organizations to enhance their defenses.
The most important lesson in Vercel’s April 2026 security bulletin is not simply that internal systems were accessed. It is the likely path the attacker took to get there. According to Vercel, the incident originated with a compromise of Context.ai, a third-party AI tool used by a Vercel employee. The attacker then used that access to take over the employee’s Vercel Google Workspace account, which in turn enabled access to some Vercel environments and non sensitive environment variables.
A new summary of the MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Round 7 evaluation reveals that the highest protection score any tested vendor achieved was a mere 31 percent — meaning that 69% of attacks went entirely undetected by even the best-performing vendor in the field. But the more significant finding was buried beneath that number. Across every identity-specific attack scenario in the evaluation, all vendors scored zero blocking — not partial detection, not near misses, but zero. The tools enterprises invest in to stop modern attacks did not intercept a single identity attack, which is precisely the class of threat that now defines the modern threat landscape.
Subscribe to The Assured Identity Brief for sharp insights on identity security, authentication, and the threats security leaders must stay ahead of.