Kevin Surace
2 minute read
What happened at Stryker today isn't a malware story. It's an identity story. And it's one the industry has seen before — the Sony hack, twelve years ago, followed a similar path. A dozen years later, the attack surface has changed. The fundamental failure hasn't.
Here's what the reporting tells us: Stryker's Microsoft environment was compromised at scale. No ransomware. No novel exploit. Handala claims 200,000 devices wiped, 50TB of data exfiltrated — and multiple sources point to Microsoft Intune as the likely mechanism. That matters, because Intune is a legitimate management platform. It's designed to remotely wipe enrolled devices across Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and ChromeOS. In the wrong hands, your trusted control plane becomes the weapon. (BleepingComputer)
To use Intune this way, you need one thing: a privileged Microsoft identity. An Entra global admin. An Intune administrator. An account with equivalent authority.
How do you get it? The same ways that have always worked: phishing, session theft, AiTM attacks against legacy MFA, help desk social engineering, stolen admin credentials. Once you own the identity plane, you don't hack 200,000 assets one by one. You issue legitimate remote commands — and the infrastructure does the rest. (Krebs on Security)
This is also why Stryker reported no indication of ransomware or malware. When an attacker controls native administrative functions — wiping endpoints, disabling login surfaces, pushing destructive actions through trusted channels — they don't need conventional malware. They are the admin.
The attacker's branding reportedly appeared on login pages. That's not a ransomware signature. That's a flag planted at the identity layer.
Stryker generated over $25 billion in revenue in 2025. Roughly $68.8 million per day. Not all of that evaporates during an outage — but the exposure compounds fast when manufacturing, order flow, hospital support, field sales, and supply chain operations go dark globally. (Q4 Capital)
Realistic damage range: $150 million to $500 million. Potentially higher.
Recovery looks like this: initial containment in days. Partial operations restored in one to three weeks. Most users and devices functional in 30 to 90 days. Full rebuild — forensics, credential reset, re-enrollment, confidence restoration — six to twelve months.
The attacker was in for hours. Stryker pays for it for months.
It's a flaw in identity assurance.
The moment a credential can be stolen, relayed, or social-engineered — the moment a push notification can be fatigued, a session hijacked, a help desk bypassed — the entire control plane is available to anyone who can impersonate the person who holds it.
Token exists precisely here. Biometric-assured, device-bound, cryptographically enforced identity. Nothing to phish. Nothing to relay. No shared secret. No easy bypass. Real presence. Real biometrics. Real proof — tied to the human being, the device, and the session.
If the identity cannot be stolen, the admin cannot be impersonated. That is the difference between cleanup and prevention. Token deals in absolutes.
With the rise of AI-generated deepfakes, which are becoming more convincing and widespread in video conferencing, companies are finding it increasingly difficult to ensure they know who they’re actually talking to during online meetings. We’re seeing the damage cybercriminals can cause when they steal credentials using social engineering, only to then bypass outdated MFA systems to access critical data or deploy ransomware. These older MFA systems just aren’t cutting it anymore, leaving companies vulnerable in ways that are making the news almost daily.
Passkeys have been promoted as the future of authentication because they replace passwords with cryptographic credentials that are resistant to traditional phishing. That is a significant improvement. A properly implemented passkey cannot simply be copied from a fake login page and replayed against the legitimate service. But a new campaign targeting Microsoft Entra users exposes an important limitation. Passkey cryptography may be strong, while the process used to enroll a new passkey can still be manipulated.
Hackers are already adapting the same social engineering playbook that defeats MFA and authenticator apps. Soon, Phishing as a Service kits will handle the technical details for them. Token removes the manipulation paths that phone based passkeys leave open.
Subscribe to The Assured Identity Brief for sharp insights on identity security, authentication, and the threats security leaders must stay ahead of.